Thermo Scientific X-ray fluorescence spectrometers

Analytical Instrumentation

The petrochemical industry relies heavily on FCC catalysts for the production of a variety of organic intermediate building blocks. Usually, this type of material is doped with precious metals such as platinum or palladium. The precious metal concentrations are often directly related to catalyst performance. Poisoning of the catalysts by common petroleum contaminants such as copper is a concern when optimizing the conversion process. Hence, monitoring the composition of FCC catalysts allows higher conversion yields in petrochemical refineries.

XRF offers particular advantages when analyzing FCC catalysts. It is the only technique capable of analyzing solids without laborious sample preparation. Other techniques often require a lengthy chemical digestion before actual analysis. XRF also offers multi-element analysis capability combined with a wide dynamic ranging from ppm up to % levels. For these reasons XRF is also adopted as preferred technique to analyze FCC catalysts by international bodies such as ASTM (e.g. ASTM D7085). The remainder of this article describes the use of Energy Dispersive XRF and Wavelength Dispersive-XRF for the analysis of catalysts.

Catalyst screening with the Thermo Scientific ARL QUANT’X EDXRF analyzer
The ARL QUANT’X EDXRF analyzer is used to determine platinum (Pt) and chlorine (Cl) content of aluminosilicate catalysts. The 50 Watt QUANT’X is equipped with a 3 mm thick Si(Li) detector. The sensitivity of this detector allows sub ppm detection limits for heavy elements such as platinum and other precious metals. Catalyst powders are measured as received by transferring 4 g of powder into an XRF cup sealed with a 4 µm thick polypropylene film on one side and a mesoporous film on the other side. The mesoporous film allows analysis in vacuum avoiding the use of helium which would add extra cost. Total analysis time equals 100 s. Table 1 shows the repeatability values for this application.

Conclusions
Either by using EDXRF or WDXRF the examples of this article shows that XRF distinguishes itself as a fast tool for a variety of FCC catalyst analyses. While EDXRF is more suitable to screen catalyst composition, WDXRF is the preferred technique when high throughput and repeatability are required.
To see our complete product portfolio, please visit www.thermoscientific.com/xpetro

Table 1: RSD repeatability values on Pt and Cl in FCC catalysts.

Figure 1: Calibration curve for sulfur in dicating a standard error of estimate of 0.011% m/m.

Table 2: RSD repeatability values for the ARL ADVANT’X on copper, mercury and sulfur determination in FCC catalysts.